Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Who isn't even assessed by Burning Tree Master Association?

 Burning Tree Master Association does not assess certain lot owners in Burning Tree One, Burning Tree East, or Burning Tree West. However, Burning Tree Master Association board of directors maintains that according to the  Covenants these areas fall under  Burning Tree Master Association.  How is it possible that Burning Tree Master Association board of directors can demand money from some lot owners and not from others when covenants have NEVER been amended to allow for that?


Is this why the Burning Tree Master Association board of directors have steadfastly refused to do the legally required audit as their own by-laws require? Would the truth come out for everyone to see, who all was never assessed while others of us have been required to pay and pick up the slack, under threats of liens? 
  

Wouldn't you like to know how many years in arrears some lot owners are and why they have not been assessed or liened when the Burning Tree Master Association says that no covenants have been changed anywhere (except in the Burning Tree South area and when Burning Tree One made the one amendment to change their roofs)?

Have you ever been assessed or are you one of the "lucky" ones who never gets assessed?





 ________________________________________________________________

 62 Pl
  • 8601 E 62 Pl  *not assessed
  • 8602 E 62 Pl  *not assessed
  • 8609 E 62 Pl  *not assessed
  • 8621 E 62 Pl  *not assessed
  • 8703 E 62 Pl  *not assessed


63 St 
8120 E 63 ST S Coventry Park (256 units )* not assessed (AP MCD COVENTRY PARK)
Nowhere were ANY covenants amended to remove them. Everyone knows that  covenants override by-laws.


_________________________________________________________________



65 St  


  • 8211 E 65th St  *not assessed      
  • 8217 E 65th St  *not assessed
  • 8225 E 65th St  *not assessed
  • 8307 E 65th St  *not assessed
  • 8315 E 65th St  *not assessed   
     
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________   

65 PL  The following (between the double lines )are located in Burning Tree Two 2100347247 owned by group that Burning Tree Master Association does not assess. However,  according to the  Covenants they ARE in Burning Tree and the covenants have NEVER been amended. )
  • 8102 E 65 PL S  *not assessed
  • 8104 E 65 PL S  *not assessed
  • 8109 E 65 PL S  *not assessed
  • 8110 E 65 PL S  *not assessed
  • 8112 E 65 PL S  *not assessed
  • 8115 E 65 PL S  *not assessed
  • 8116 E 65 PL S  *not assessed
  • 8118 E 65 PL S  *not assessed
  • 8123 E 65 PL S  *not assessed
  • 8124 E 65 PL S  *not assessed
  • 8126 E 65 PL S  *not assessed
  • 8131 E 65 PL S  *not assessed
  • 8132 E 65 PL S  *not assessed
  • 8134 E 65 PL S  *not assessed
  • 8302 E 65 PL S  *not assessed
  • 8304 E 65 PL S  *not assessed
  • 8310 E 65 PL S  *not assessed
  • 8311 E 65 PL S  *not assessed
  • 8312 E 65 PL S  *not assessed
  • 8318 E 65 PL S  *not assessed
  • 8320 E 65 PL S  *not assessed
65 ST
  • 8122 E 65 ST S  *not assessed
  • 8132 E 65 ST S  *not assessed
  • 8140 E 65 ST S  *not assessed
  • 8310 E 65 ST S  *not assessed



81 PL  

  • 6504 S 81 PL E  *not assessed
  • 6505 S 81 PL E  *not assessed
  • 6506 S 81 PL E  *not assessed
  • 6512 S 81 PL E  *not assessed
  • 6514 S 81 PL E  *not assessed
  • 6515 S 81 PL E  *not assessed
  • 6520 S 81 PL E  *not assessed
  • 6522 S 81 PL E  *not assessed
   
83 E Ave
  6502 S 83 AV E       *not assessed

_____________________________________________________________
 
_____________________________________________________________

84 E Av  
  •    6398 S 84 E Ave *not assessed
________________________________________________________________
 86 E Ave    
6112 S. 86th E. Avenue-Silver Springs. See below-(this address in Burning Tree East is never assessed!) 
6221 S 86 E Ave *not assessed
6223 S 86 E Ave *not assessed
6229 S 86 E Ave *not assessed
6231 S 86 E Ave *not assessed
6235 S 86 E Ave *not assessed
6205 S 86 E Ave *not assessed

________________________________________________________________
87 E Ave   
 


  • 6102 S 87 E Ave and 6112 S. 86th E. Avenue  Silver Springs Apartments. (272 units) They were certainly included in the PUD and COVENANTS WERE NEVER AMENDED TO EXCLUDE THEM!!. HOWEVER, BURNING TREE MASTER ASSOCIATION DOES NOT ASSESS THEM, so how did they get removed  from the PUD?* 


For the following on 87 E Ave : According to Burning Tree East covenants you were given at the time you purchased your home this address was to be in Burning Tree Area #6.  However, it was never  incorporated so the the lot owner never should have been assessed! Have you ever been??? Check with the Oklahoma Secretary of State to confirm it for yourself, that there is no BURNING TREE AREA #6 ASSOCIATION, INC.
  • 6203 S 87 E Ave 
  • 6204 S 87th E Ave  
  • 6211 S 87 E Ave  
  • 6212 S 87th E Ave 
  • 6219 S 87th E Ave 
  • 6220 S 87th E Ave 
  • 6227 S 87 E Ave  
  • 6228 S 87th E Ave  
  • 6235 S 87 E Ave  
  • 6236 S 87 E Ave   
  • 6243 S 87 E Ave 
  • 6244 S 87th E Ave  
  • 6249 S 87 E Ave 
  • 6252 S 87th E Ave  
  • 6253 S 87 E Ave 


What area of Burning Tree Am I In?


The right to freedom of the press, guaranteed by the first amendment, allows an individual to express themselves through publication and dissemination. It is part of the constitutional protection of freedom of expression. 

2 comments:

  1. Looks like a class action lawsuit since they were assessed at one time and there were no covenant amendments.

    ReplyDelete
  2. § 1014.1. Interpretation and Enforcement of the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws Homeowners can force the board of directors to follow the certificate/articles of incorporation states and/or the bylaws by simply taking them to small claims court. (Ex: the board of directors refuses to do an audit that is required by the by-laws and no amendment was ever made to the by-laws; the homeowners have the right to ask the court to have the audit done as there by laws state. (Were you aware that they had been getting a "tax review" in place of an audit. Seriously... A tax review is simply a review of the taxes?)

    ReplyDelete